10-17-2014, 03:56 PM
I agree with Graeme.
Jeff
Jeff
(10-17-2014, 11:33 AM)GraemeJ Wrote:(10-17-2014, 07:47 AM)popoff Wrote: I don't have any objection about price of the app, only about misleading advertising.
To be fair to Mike - this marketing change was mainly brought about by the users, not the author.
He has put a lot of work into both the original version and the (now known as) Pro version and many of us felt that, considering the new version was going to be released as a free upgrade (and coupled with the fact that the Play Store platform is very poorly designed for upgrades - which you can read about in other threads) Mike was not receiving anything like a decent financial return for all his effort, from which we all benefit.
The upshot of all this was the majority of users said they would be more than pleased to pay for the new version (which has many, many changes and features not in the original version).
Basically, we bludgeoned him into it!!